data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fe99/2fe997b3a247b8f16dad953cf0fd1ad1059a6b10" alt=""
From over 100 pictures of cycles in the Bodleian Library
Nobody these days would chose a crazy name like "psycho" of course. Bicycles today have sensible names, like "surly".
A week or two ago my brother bought a bike, and as I am aging earlier than he is, I feel obliged to offer him some advice.
He was quite a keen cyclist when he was younger, so there isn't much point in pretending that I have anything to offer in the areas of fitness, diet, equipment, technique, riding etiquette, route planning, safety, or crime prevention. What he doesn't know already about any of these, he can easily glean from the internet.
But there are a couple of pieces of advice that I reckon I should pass on:
Today I visited the seventh church in my Jenkins challenge, which also ranks seventh in terms of distance from home. That leaves five to go.
This turned out to be one of the tougher Jenkins outings so far. It is my longest trip on the bike yet, at more than 40 miles, and involved some of the most challenging climbs.
Reaching seven out of twelve churches means I've crossed off 58% of the destinations. I started with the nearest, and I reckon I've done about 40% of the total distance, and 36% of the climbing.
The route I had mapped out beforehand took me via Hambledon, and would have brought me back through Marlow. In the end I decided to avoid even more hills on the return, and came back through Loudwater instead. I expected a grim journey, from High Wycombe to Loudwater on busy roads. However, I discovered a cycle path that avoids the worst. I imagine this will prove useful in future, when I want to reach destinations beyond High Wycombe, without having to brave some daunting climbs.
The weather was a bit warmer today than it has been recently, but it was overcast all day, with a suggestion of rain from time to time. It was also quite windy. Oddly, whatever direction I was travelling, the wind seemed to be in my face.
In 2007, SQW carried out an assessment of the economic value of cycling for Cycling England. It works out as 91p per trip.
This is made up of:
At the current rate, I could calculate savings equal to the cost of the bike after about two years - as long as I ignored the fact that almost all of my rides are for recreation, on uncongested roads, and not a substitue for car journeys; and I've been bunking off work for a fair proportion of them over the last few weeks.
However, the health benefits alone are worth nearly 40p a trip to the government. I could, of course just give them 40p each time I feel like going for a ride, and save myself a lot of trouble. But then I'm not doing this to save the government money. So perhaps I won't.
Use of a bicycle is most common among men aged 17-29, but even they make only 4% of their journeys by bicycle. Men in their forties make 2% of journeys by bicycle; and those over 50 make just over 1%. Most cycle trips are for commuting (38%) or leisure (31%).
Over the last 10 years the number of trips by bicycle has declined by around 15%, and the average distance travelled by bicycle has fallen by more than 10%, but both have levelled off recently.
From Department for Transport Statistics
(When they say that cycling declines with age, I think they mean in quantity, not quality).
I was out on the bike every day last week, except for friday, and covered more than my goal of 56 miles over the week. That makes three weeks in a row that I've managed at least four rides, and more than 56 miles in total, so the pressure on myself to keep on track is increasing.
The weather has been lovely again today, if a little cold, and I managed to cover 18 miles in a couple of hours. The route lacked any real interest, but at least it left me feeling invigorated.
What's more, if I've done the calculations right, today's ride burned off the equivalent of three bacon rolls. I'm not sure if I should allow myself to bank those for future treats: probably not.
Posting a link to this picture might become mandatory for blogs related to cycling. I saw it on Cycleliciousness.
Apparently the "Green path" provides a ring-road around Copenhagen for cyclists, and it seems that cycles have priority over cars, at least at this junction.
A topical topic, with this week's announcement of new plans for London.
This has nothing much to do with cycling.
Normally at this time in the evening, if I was watching anything, I would be watching Newsnight on BBC2. However, last week I got the new Freeview box working properly, so tonight I've been channel hopping.
I've just realised that I've ended up in front of BBC Parliament for the last hour; fascinated by the Economic Affairs Committee of the House of Lords, taking evidence on the economic impact of immigration.
Apart from high standards of courtesy, everyone involved seems committed, well-adjusted, well informed, and articulate. It is a treat to see witnesses being asked thoughful questions, and then given the space to deliver a considered reply.
The result is more interesting, more informative and more thought provoking than the adolescent sneering that poor old Paxo is forced to impose on us by his keepers.
The Economic Affairs Committee of the House of Lords may not be as entertaining as Newsnight, but then Newsnight isn't as entertaining as Top Gear. Right now, as intelligent current affairs TV, I reckon that the lords are out-performing them both.
Today I ticked off two more of the Jenkins churches: this one, in Warfield, and St James the Less in Dorney. Having visited Shottesbrooke on Friday, and Bisham on Saturday, I have now reached the nearest four of the twelve in the last three days, and five of the first six in just over a week.
So the challenge is off to a decent start, but none of the easy ones are left to visit. I have reached 40% of the churches, but I've only covered 20% of the distance, and only climbed 10% of the hills. The pace will now slow down considerably.
I had the route carefully worked out for today, at 21 miles in total, but for much of the time I was on minor roads that I do not know, so I ended up doing about 25 miles, by not checking the map carefully enough.
All in all though, I suspect I've had more fun this weekend than the Archbishop of Canterbury. He is being widely criticised for moving off safe ground, to engage with issues that appear too subtle for the press to handle. Thank goodness some people in public life have such courage, say I.
Let's examine my new bar bag.
The first neat thing is that my existing bar bag and this one clip onto the same bracket, so I can easily switch between different sizes, depending on how much I need to carry.
The second neat thing is that there are separate pockets with just enough room for my glasses, a puncture repair kit, my mobile phone, and a map, while the main compartment is big enough to hold my wallet and the camera, leaving just enough room for a couple of pork pies (or an apple and a banana).
Apparently a bar bag is the best place for a camera because the mount absorbs the worst of the vibration. Unlike putting the camera in a bag on the pannier, it also means that it is easily accessible without having to dismount.
To fit the new bag, I had to move around the other stuff on the handlebars, but after a bit of fiddling around, it all seems to be fairly well organised now.
It's Sunday, so I thought a picture of a church would be appropriate.
That is not the main reason for this picture, though.
The point of all this is to set up a series of challenges that will encourage me to get out and ride the bike once the initial wave of enthusiasm wears off.
Some of the goals that I am setting myself are quantitative. they cover inputs (so many miles a week, lengthening the longest ride, increasing speed) and outcomes (shortening the notch where my belt buckles, and so on). But numbers are only part of the picture - I am also setting myself some qualitative goals.
One suggestion that I particularly liked was to visit as many as possible of the churches in Simon Jenkins' book of England's thousand best churches.
There are three that are fairly close to home (Shottesbrook, Dorney and Bisham), two of which I have reached on earlier outings. The next four represent a bit more of a challenge (this one at Langley, Stoke Poges, West Wycombe and Warfield). Of course the beauty of this idea is that, a bit like a computer game, it gets increasingly difficult at each level. Beyond the first seven, reaching the next three, and a total of ten is going to be a lot tougher. And it is probably best to think of the first 100 (or even the first 20) as a "stretch goal" for some time in the future.
St Mary's church in Langley dates from 1150, but apparently the outstanding features are a pew and library gifted by the Kedermister family in the 17th Century. As it happened, the church was closed yesterday, for refurbishment, and it sounds as though visitors are only welcome at certain times. So now that I've located it, a repeat visit is called for, some time after easter, with a bit more advanced preparation. Meanwhile here is a virtual tour.
I stopped reading political comment by Simon Jenkins long ago, as his world view floated away from any grounding in reality, but his book on churches is a treat, and a pretty good incentive to explore new routes.
"Go further" said the bike, so today I braved the cold, and pushed it a bit, covering just over 38 miles. To be honest, it was more than I was ready for, but it establishes a number of milestones.
Towards the end I was converting miles to kilometres in my head at one kilometre = 2/3 of a mile, because I knew I was close to reaching my metric age. As a result, I ended up doing an extra two mile circle around home to make sure I covered enough distance. Once I got home, I discovered that I only had to cover 0.62 miles for each kilometre, so I could have bailed out three miles earlier, and still reached my age in kilometres.
As it stands, I arrived home tired, but happy, and despite a hot bath, I suspect I'm going to feel the effects tomorrow.