tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3395883144047931311.post1681353765214696441..comments2023-09-03T10:29:06.337+01:00Comments on Tlatet: Bandstandsgom1http://www.blogger.com/profile/07201321705941282416noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3395883144047931311.post-56250877032721391722014-11-16T22:11:22.918+00:002014-11-16T22:11:22.918+00:00Thanks Dan. I think there is another reason why &q...Thanks Dan. I think there is another reason why "building=bandstand" is useful. Some of these may no longer be used as a bandstand. In that case leisure=bandstand is not strictly true. However they are still notable structures / landmarks. In the long run allowing both would be a simple way of distinguishing these different cases. It doesn't work yet - because the documentation isn't clear. Similarly amenity=shelter can co-exist with leisure=bandstand as tags, just as in reality, a bandstand might be used for concerts on a sunny sunday afternoon in August, and as a shelter on a rainy monday in February.gom1https://www.blogger.com/profile/07201321705941282416noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3395883144047931311.post-72913636391251693432014-11-16T18:24:11.430+00:002014-11-16T18:24:11.430+00:00Thanks for writing this up! It's interesting t...Thanks for writing this up! It's interesting that the coverage seems so good - as far as I know no-one's ever had any kind of initiative to get them all mapped. It might be because people often quite like mapping parks.<br /><br />One reason for people using building=bandstand might be so that it renders looking like a building? (People can use building=yes and leisure=bandstand together, but it might not occur to people as readily.)Danhttp://www.mcld.co.uk/noreply@blogger.com